What Damage Mitigation Obligation means in a Turkish medical case
The review compares medical advice, available options, urgency, cost and the patient's actual decisions to determine whether an alleged avoidable increase is supported.
A defendant must not simply blame the patient for a difficult recovery. Reasonableness is assessed in the real circumstances, including access and language barriers.
Evidence that usually deserves early attention
Keep the relevant records in their original form, with dates and the issuing provider identified. This checklist helps organise an initial review.
- Medical advice and referrals received
- Appointments attended or unavailable
- Reasons for declining or delaying treatment
- Steps taken to protect health and preserve records
Official primary sources
Read the official text relevant to the treatment date and legal question. These sources explain the framework; they do not determine disputed facts in an individual case.
- Turkish Code of Obligations, Law No. 6098Grand National Assembly of Türkiye
- Official Court of Cassation decision searchCourt of Cassation of Türkiye
- Patient Rights RegulationRepublic of Türkiye Ministry of Health
Related glossary concepts
Questions patients often ask
Must I accept the original clinic's revision offer?
An offer should be assessed for medical suitability, risk and any settlement or release terms. Reasonable recovery decisions matter, but a clinic's offer alone does not decide what the patient must accept. Keep independent advice and the offer in full.