Published by Medical Law Türkiye · Updated 2 October 2026. Legal enquiries: Att. Başak Çavuşoğulları and Att. Büşra Ocak .
What a medical liability review examines
A poor outcome alone does not establish medical malpractice. A review identifies the provider’s duties, the care and information actually given, the alleged departure from the applicable standard, and its connection to documented harm. Consent, treatment and aftercare may raise separate questions.
A complication and its management are different questions
A recognised complication may occur despite appropriate care. That does not answer whether it was explained, detected and managed appropriately. Compare the clinical response with the information available at each stage, using complete records and suitable specialist evidence.
Information and consent
The Patient Rights Regulation addresses understandable information and a voluntary decision about treatment. The procedure, risks, alternatives, timing, language and opportunity for questions matter. A signed form is evidence, but should be read with the consultation and surrounding records.
The provider and legal relationship determine the route
Private treatment may raise contractual, tort and consumer-law questions. Some elective aesthetic disputes are assessed under work-contract provisions, but the actual undertaking and treatment purpose must be established. Do not assume every procedure guarantees a cure or a particular appearance.
A public-provider claim may require an administrative application and proceedings against the responsible administration. Confirm the institution’s legal status rather than relying on the word “hospital” or “university”. The appropriate defendant and forum need individual assessment.
What losses may be assessed
Financial losses can include medically supported further treatment, care costs and demonstrated income loss where the legal conditions and causal connection are established. Refunds and expenses are not automatic. Non-financial harm is assessed separately under the relevant rules. See how compensation is assessed .
Filing periods and starting dates
There is no single deadline for every medical claim. The provider’s public or private status, the legal basis, the remedy and the relevant dates affect both the period and its starting point. Contract, tort and defective-work rules differ; public-provider claims follow a separate administrative route. Obtain an individual deadline assessment promptly and do not assume time runs only from discovery or always from surgery.
The Code of Obligations has distinct tort, contractual and defective-work provisions, including Articles 72, 147, 149 and 478. Choosing a period requires identifying the claim and start date; quoting a five-year period for all private treatment is insufficient. Provide treatment dates, discovery dates, provider details and every prior application or proceeding to your lawyer.
Prepare for an initial review
Keep operative notes, consent forms, discharge instructions, dated photographs, complete communications, payments and independent medical findings. Send a brief chronology first and discuss how to share sensitive records. An enquiry does not itself create an attorney-client relationship or preserve a filing deadline.
Frequently asked questions
Can I claim because treatment did not succeed?
Failure alone is insufficient. The review must examine the undertaking, care, consent, harm and the legal basis.
Can review begin from another country?
An initial review can usually begin from abroad. An appropriately drafted and formalised power of attorney may allow a Turkish lawyer to handle legal steps. A medical examination, evidence requirement or other procedural step may still require your participation; the arrangements depend on the case.
Does a consent form prevent a claim?
Consent to a disclosed risk differs from agreement to deficient care. The information and decision-making process must be assessed separately.
Does a complaint to the hospital protect the court deadline?
Do not assume so. Different routes have separate requirements, and any effect on a time period must be checked.
Sources and related guidance
- Patient Rights Regulation: information, consent and access to records
- Turkish Code of Obligations, Law No. 6098: liability, damages and differing time rules
The official Turkish text and the version relevant to the treatment date govern. These sources explain legal rules; individual medical and factual questions require their own evidence.